This week saw two more reviews of The Hunger Games. One, by N.D. Wilson, argues that it is flawed to the core because it doesn’t understand story. Mark Mitchell also finds the plot artificially shallow. Oddly enough, however, while Wilson critiques it for having the heroine participate in the slaughter Mitchell argues that her ability to stay above the fray was too neatly contrived.
And speaking of children in bad places, parents, be very very careful of the remedial “christian” camps you consider sending your kids to. Some can be beneficial. Others are, well, very much not.
This week Notre Dame University and other Catholic organization filed suit against HHS to protect their religious liberty. Mary Ann Glendon (also a Romney advisor for judicial matters) explains the suit. But the best statement comes from PowerLine:
It was only three years ago that the University of Notre Dame invited President Obama to appear as the speaker at its commencement ceremony. There is no need for us to ask how that hopey changey stuff is working’ out for Notre Dame and its sister Catholic institutions. The complaint definitively answers that question.
And speaking of Catholics, President Obama seems to be doing a pretty good job of alienating them, which isn’t good for him in an election year. He’s also losing ground in the tech world. And although running unopposed, that hasn’t kept him from losing significant votes to nobodies (or anybody else) in some primaries:
So far, Obama has had weak showings in Louisiana (76-24) and North Carolina (79-21), and squeakers in Oklahoma (57-43), West Virginia (59-41), Arkansas (59-41) and Kentucky (58-42). And Barack Obama had no credible opposition in any of these races. In some instances, his only opponent was an incarcerated felon!
Romney’s image, in contrast, appears to be on the rise despite the harsh primary season. And Philip Klein has advice for conservatives still worried about Romney as president:
Critics of Romney who argue that he’s really a liberal and boosters who claim that he’s a true conservative both err by attempting to understand Romney through an ideological prism. In reality, he’s a businessman who wants to apply his well-honed management skills to the public sector. If one is to be successful in the business world, the important thing is to satisfy customers and maximize profits.
If Romney is convinced that conservatives will enthusiastically support him no matter what, then he’ll make the calculation that he has room to migrate left during the general-election campaign and throughout a potential presidency. But if he feels uneasy about his support among conservatives, he’s much more likely to run and govern from the right.
And turning to culture, here’s an article taking theological issue with the art of Thomas Kinkade. Along the way the author makes worthwhile insights on christianity and the arts.
The world ended last May. Or at least it was supposed to. Apparently God doesn’t listen to Harold Camping. But what about all those who did? One journalist tracked several of them down.
Are we raising a generation that cannot learn?
They have never learned to listen to criticism, to recover from disappointment, or to slog through difficulties with no guarantee of success except commitment. The person who is never challenged is also never refined, never learns to cope with the setbacks that come on the way to high endeavor. And it is not only in the academic realm, of course, that they may be hampered: a full life outside of university also requires the ability to confront one’s weaknesses and recover from defeat. Despite the admittedly important emphasis on character formation in our schools — on tolerance, anti-racism, refusal of bullying, and so on — it seems that we have failed to show students what real achievement looks like and what it will require of them.
Eric Metaxas didn’t like Avengers: “For over two hours I stared at the screen and saw, well, nothing. I left the theater not knowing what to make of what I had just watched. There was nothing particularly offensive about the film. Nor were there any ideas that I needed to discuss with my daughter afterward. In fact, there were no ideas at all”
And finally, here's a unique use for the ipad I hadn't seen yet (this is a whole new level of fruit ninja). Apparently the question is something along the lines of "are you enjoying your new ipad?'
What? No "Beware: idyllic paintings of cabins may just kidnap your soul and drag you to hell if you look at them!" warning label on the Kincaid article?
ReplyDeleteAnd, I find the Mitchell/Wilson opposite critique of the Hunger Games extremely amusing.
As to the Avengers comment...his loss. Seriously. Nothing to talk about at the end of that movie? Was he paying the least bit of attention?
The Harold Camping article was sad...
Tangentially, has anyone read Wilson's 100 Cupboards series? I recently finished the first one, and am indecisive about reading the others.
ReplyDeleteTNT
Read them. They are good.
DeleteThe plotting of the 100 Cupboards trilogy is... nonstandard, I guess I'd say. If there's an "inciting incident" at the front end of any of the three books, there's certainly no clear "quest" defined anywhere near the beginning. The world and situations just sort of evolve until there's eventually an evil that needs to be quashed. I had to wade about 3/5 of the way through Dandelion Fire (book 2) before it really started to draw me in. There are good reasons for why things happen, but you tend to find them out after the fact, which makes it seem random for quite a while.
DeleteAll that said, Wilson's take on magic-from-a-Christian-perspective is verbal, individual, logical-and-yet-mysterious, and overall fascinating and well done. Plus there's a lot of good stuff about family and identity. But it's too postmodern of a work, with too high a sense of irony or even cynicism -- too many plot threads that don't resolve eucatastrophically -- for it to warrant the name of fairy tale. So don't go in with that expectation.
Personally I feel that Wilson, while he's good now (see also his Notes from the Tilt-a-Whirl, which Jonathan K. categorizes as "creative nonfiction"), will be much more worth reading in a decade or two, when he's seasoned a bit: wisened, integrated, lost some of his excitement over novelty, and mostly just mellowed. (Probably he'd agree.)