But right now, I want to bring a TIME magazine article to your attention.
It is called Articles of Faith: What Journalists Should Be Asking Politicians About Religion. In the article Amy Sullivan lists her Ten Commandments for what kind of questions journalists should ask people running for office.
Here is a quick glimpse:
- Be relevant. You can ask: "1) Would your religious beliefs have any bearing on the actions you would take in office? and 2) if so, how?
- Focus on policy questions. That's what matters.
- Personal belief questions don't matter unless it will impact their policies.
- Don't try to make them accountable to everything that anyone around them (or who supports them) says. Allow for degrees of separation.
- But, ask about the Jeremiah Wrights. Those who have clearly impacted the candidate are fair for questioning.
- But, even though it is fair game, make sure you understand the context. i.e. is it normal in the context of church or theological community.
- Know what the language means. i.e. If they feel called to do something that doesn't mean that they have had a direct message from God to take over America.
- Know the difference between their cultural language and code words that they may use to win supporters.
- Stop using the word "devout" it doesn't mean anything. Be more specific.
- Be consistent and don't discriminate.*
*Note: all of this is my trying to distill it down, if you want more clarification, read what she wrote.
So, what do you think of these rules? Do you agree? What would you add?
I think I would add "Ask questions appropriate to the questioning format/venue." The submission question put to Bachmann may have been legitimate, but it was the wrong place and time to ask it. There was no way she could offer a comprehensive answer to a question like that in the format of a presidential debate.
ReplyDeleteOther than that, in general I agree with the other points.