QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'I gave fear up for Lent this year." - Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Monday, September 26, 2011
"Something you don't have in common."
From: Jim Messina, BarackObama.com [mailto:info@barackobama.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:42 PM
To: Jeremiah Lorrig
Subject: Something you don't have in common
Jeremiah --Here's something you don't have in common with 347 other supporters of this movement who tell us they live in your area.
That many of your neighbors have decided to own a piece of this campaign by making a donation of whatever they could afford. For some, that meant just $5. For others, it meant $100 or more. But each had their own personal reason for giving.
Our records show that you aren't one of the 347 people in Leesburg, VA who have stepped up for 2012. Now's your chance to change that.
Make a donation of $5 or more today to support the campaign before the critical September 30th deadline.
Here's why you should join your neighbors in supporting this campaign: We've been running the numbers, and with hundreds of thousands of individual donors across the country -- we are now well on our way to a million people.
In the 2008 campaign, it took us more than a year to reach that milestone. This time around, we could cross it as soon as October -- just six months after the launch of the campaign.
Between now and then, we have an important fundraising deadline.
Our opponents have significant operations on the ground in key battleground states, full-time candidates without day jobs, and a lot of media attention to fuel their campaigns.
President Obama has you. And when you're building a grassroots organization from the bottom up, the first person gets the next one involved. And the first 347 provide the foundation and inspiration for the next 347.
Support the campaign before the deadline, and bring us closer to one million donors -- give $5 today:
https://donate.barackobama.com/One-in-a-Million
Thank you,
Messina
Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

Thursday, September 8, 2011
4 Republican Candidates Stand Up for Parental Rights

Last night’s MSNBC/Politico debate was a spirited and passionate discussion but homeschoolers ears perked up when the candidates engaged in a lively discussion of parental rights. Bachmann, Romney, Santorum, and Perry all stood with parents on the issue of parental rights.
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann was the first candidate to raise the issue of parental rights saying, “What I am very concerned about is the issue of Parental Rights.” She then asked, “Should the federal government control these areas or should parents and localities control these areas?” Former Governor Mitt Romney following Bachmann’s lead was very clear, “I believe in parental rights and parental responsibility for our kids.”
Former Senator Rick Santorum, homeschool father of seven, underlined that parental rights should never be put on the government chopping block. He even addressed specific government policies dictating parents’ actions and differentiating himself from Perry by asking, “How about instead of having an opt out [option for parents] having an opt in [option]?”
Bachmann referenced the 2007 HPV debate declaring, “It is wrong for government whether it’s state or federal government to impose on parents what they must do to inoculate their children. This is very serious. And I think it is very important again that parents to have that right [to make health and education choices for their children].” Santorum agreed saying, “How about Parental Rights being more important than State’s rights?” Confronted with Bachmann’s jab, Governor Rick Perry replied that he not only believes in parental rights but also made sure that his controversial policy reflected that. “We offered an opt out—I don’t know what is stronger for parental rights then having that opt out.”
In the end, Bachmann summed up the feeling of the debate, “We have the best results when we have the private sector and the family involved, and we have the worst results when the federal government gets involved.”
Here are the highlights of the exchange.
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Questioning Faith
- Be relevant. You can ask: "1) Would your religious beliefs have any bearing on the actions you would take in office? and 2) if so, how?
- Focus on policy questions. That's what matters.
- Personal belief questions don't matter unless it will impact their policies.
- Don't try to make them accountable to everything that anyone around them (or who supports them) says. Allow for degrees of separation.
- But, ask about the Jeremiah Wrights. Those who have clearly impacted the candidate are fair for questioning.
- But, even though it is fair game, make sure you understand the context. i.e. is it normal in the context of church or theological community.
- Know what the language means. i.e. If they feel called to do something that doesn't mean that they have had a direct message from God to take over America.
- Know the difference between their cultural language and code words that they may use to win supporters.
- Stop using the word "devout" it doesn't mean anything. Be more specific.
- Be consistent and don't discriminate.*
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Lend a Hand
I found an opportunity for you to do a small thing to help make a huge difference. Sunday, August 28, 2011
Sunday's Child
